Hi John
I have another wish, which I don't think would be simple or quick to integrate...
It would be great if we could have more control over the fit data through our MPB points. An example below is a F measurement on my albite standard, with my albite wavescan overlain behind. When all 4 points are included either side you can see that the Lo side isn't fit quite right to the measured MBP. There is a potential outlier on the Hi side, so when I exclude that (second attached image), the Lo side fits better but obviously the turning point of the quadratic is now drawn down so I am probably overestimating my F peak measurement.
Granted you could argue that all those points should probably be kept in anyway, but I still think it would be great if we could have more options (up to cubic polynomials, exponential functions?, changing coefficents, turning points etc) so we could further refine the MBP fits when you are dealing with low peak intensities.
I have attached a screenshot of some software we use to process laser ablation data to illustrate the type of thing I am talking about. Its showing an exponential function and the ability to change parameters manually to fit your data. It has other things that wouldn't really be of use in the screenshot, but I was more thinking of just some slider bars to change coefficients, dropdown to change fit types etc.
Anyway definitely a far future dream, but I think it would be a good addition...
Cheers