My contributions to the crowd source:
LDE1 (nom. 60A): dcalc = 61.05 A, k = 0.013 (The JEOL inspection certificate I received gives 60.1 A, and no value for k)
LDE2 (nom. 100A): dcalc = 101.66 A, k = 0.034 (The JEOL inspection certificate I received gives 98.6 A, no value for k)
LDEB (nom. 145A): dcalc = 148.11 A, k = 0.034 (The JEOL inspection certificate I received gives 144.0A, and no value for k)
These values were determined iteratively using Excel (but not using Julien's macro, which I've only just seen - today (Dec 15th...)). I'll give Julien's macro a run sometime "soon" (i.e. before AMAS-XIII in Feb next year) and see how the sets of d and k actually compare! I presume the macro is multi-lingual, i.e. conversant with JEOL-speak L (mm) values and not just CAMECA-speak sinthetas??
Rescans in a new MDB using the above info in the crystals.dat file gives Plot! KLM markers that fit very well on the LDE1 and LDE2 crystals, but the KLMs on the LDEB using 148.11 are still a little "off". One thing I noted was a huge (2.6mm!) peak shift between BKa measured on B metal and BKa measured on BN. The B metal gives a calculated d of 150.7, whereas the BN gives a calculated d of 148.72. The latter is much closer to the values calculated from the higher order Ka peaks from Si, Al, Mg and O (using SiO2, Al2O3 and MgO), supplemented by various fluorides and pure metals (L lines....).
PS: Haven't got close to using CalcZAF, which was why I was puzzled where the peak position calculator was hiding.....
PPS: Yes curious the JEOL 100mm RC spectros use the same L mm value as the 140mm RCs! Some behind the scenes jiggery-pokery from JEOL...
Cheers,
DAvid
QUT