This topic is for discussing the new CalcImage capability to acquire trace element maps in *literally* half the time and with *better* precision than traditional off-peak measurements...
Of course there is a caveat, and that is: although precision is improved with the MAN background method, at trace levels, accuracy becomes the dominant issue. The solution is to use a suitable "blank" standard to adjust accuracy during the matrix iteration. Of course that means you're *not* going to be using this method for monazite mapping!
This blank correction method for improving accuracy in off-peak and/or MAN background corrected acquisitions is discussed in several topics such as:
http://probesoftware.com/smf/index.php?topic=4.0http://probesoftware.com/smf/index.php?topic=307.0http://probesoftware.com/smf/index.php?topic=29.0http://probesoftware.com/smf/index.php?topic=204.0This topic is reserved for discussion of the MAN method for trace element mapping in materials where a suitable blank standard can be obtained, e.g., pure metal, pure oxides and some simple silicates (ZrSiO4) and some simple sulfides (FeS2).
A nice example of how sensitive the MAN background correction is for quant mapping is seen here:
Note that because the Hf concentration in this zircon is changing slightly, the MAN calculated bgd intensities also vary (as they should), since the average Z is also changing.
Unlike what one sees in the off-peak measured data where the precision in the off-peak intensities is not sufficient to detect the variation in the continuum: