Hi John,
I agree that BaF2 and MgF2 are pretty robust standards. But isn't CaF2 awfully beam sensitive? Under what conditions do you operate to mimimize this sensitivity? I've attached a chart recording of F Ka count rate on LDE1 and Ca Ka count rate on PET over a period of about 5 minutes using a 15 kV potential, 10 nA current (on Faraday cup), and 10 micron beam diameter.
Brian
Hi Brian,
Interesting that they seem somewhat anti-correlated!
To be honest, I haven't used a CaF2 standard since I was at Berkeley many years ago and yes, I think you are correct, though the BaF2 synthetic I use nowadays seems more robust. In both cases however, I've only used it for trace fluorine in glasses, in which cases the background characterization is much more critical than the standard intensity.
And which is also why I'm hoping to find a robust fluorine silicate that would be a better matrix match for major and minor fluorine as Ed Vicenzi has requested. Any ideas?