All,
My work organization is pressuring all instrument users to develop "quality plans" that encompass a variety of topics such as development of standards (they prefer NIST-traceable), evaluation of software to ensure that it "delivers the correct answer", and finally the use of ISO-developed procedures for analytical work.
With regard to the latter, I have limited experience with ISO procedures, but the few I have seen tend to be conservative, overly bureaucratic, too general and not up-to-date with current technology.
Unfortunately, one cannot view the procedures without buying them, so I was wondering if anyone has any opinion about or experience with any of these ISO standards:
ISO 11938
Revision / Edition: 1ST Chg: Date: 03/01/12
MICROBEAM ANALYSIS - ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS - METHODS FOR ELEMENTAL-MAPPING ANALYSIS USING WAVELENGTH-DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY
ISO 14594 - Base Document Only
Revision / Edition: 1ST Chg: Date: 08/01/03
MICROBEAM ANALYSIS - ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS - GUIDELINES FORTHE DETERMINATION OF
EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS FOR WAVELENGTH DISPERSIVE SPECTROSCOPY
ISO 14595
Revision / Edition: 03 Chg: Date: 06/01/03
MICROBEAM ANALYSIS - ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS - GUIDELINES FOR THE SPECIFICATION OF CERTIFIED
REFERENCE MATERIALS (CRMS)
ISO 22489
Revision / Edition: 1ST Chg: Date: 12/15/06
MICROBEAM ANALYSIS - ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS - QUANTITATIVE POINT ANALYSIS FOR BULK SPECIMEN USING WAVELENGTH DISPERSIVE X-RAY SPECTROSCOPY
Cheers,
Karen