Hi Ben,
I took a look at your MDB file and I agree- none of your standards seem to agree with each other!
Some other observations (that don't seem to affect things, though turning off the APF and oxygen by stoichiometry did help, but are generally unnecessary):
1. You have the coating corrections turned on, but both your standards and unknowns are specified as carbon coated.
2. You have aggregate mode turned on but no aggregate elements.
3. You have particle/thin film corrections turned on but these seem to be bulk standards.
4. You have blank corrections turned on, but no blank assigned.
5. You had negative k-ratios being forced to zero and no need for it.
6. You have the standards calculated using stoichiometric oxygen, when normally one would just use the value from the standard database.
7. Your PHA baseline setting are *way* too tight. Just place all your baselines at 1 volt or so, and set your window to 9 volts or so.
8. You are using APF factors and I don't know why.
9. And most unforgivable: your PFE software is about 8 months out of date!
![Shocked :o](https://probesoftware.com/smf/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)
Once I turn all these unnecessary things off, here is your silicon primary standard:
St 809 Set 11 BIR-1G Basaltic Glass, Results in Elemental Weight Percents
ELEM: Si Al Ca Mg Na K Fe Ti O Mn
TYPE: ANAL ANAL ANAL ANAL ANAL ANAL ANAL ANAL SPEC SPEC
BGDS: LIN POLY LIN LIN LIN LIN LIN EXP
TIME: 15.00 15.00 15.00 20.00 30.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 --- ---
BEAM: 10.03 10.03 10.03 10.03 10.03 10.03 10.03 10.03 --- ---
ELEM: Si Al Ca Mg Na K Fe Ti O Mn SUM
1094 22.068 8.390 9.459 5.755 2.904 .952 7.920 2.154 43.328 .147 103.078
1095 22.061 8.326 9.404 5.699 2.995 .918 7.757 2.151 43.328 .147 102.787
1096 22.290 8.126 9.449 5.926 2.771 .956 7.520 2.141 43.328 .147 102.655
1097 22.217 8.277 9.499 5.648 2.801 .916 7.748 2.127 43.328 .147 102.708
1098 22.482 8.146 9.567 5.645 2.713 .932 8.000 2.132 43.328 .147 103.092
AVER: 22.223 8.253 9.476 5.735 2.837 .935 7.789 2.141 43.328 .147 102.864
SDEV: .175 .114 .061 .116 .112 .019 .185 .012 .000 .000 .207
SERR: .078 .051 .027 .052 .050 .008 .083 .005 .000 .000
%RSD: .79 1.39 .64 2.02 3.95 1.98 2.38 .55 .00 .00
PUBL: 22.203 8.203 9.505 5.668 1.372 .030 7.804 .623 43.328 .147 98.886
%VAR: (.09) (.61) (-.31) (1.17) 106.69 3016.53 (-.19) 243.45 .00 .00
DIFF: (.02) (.05) (-.03) (.07) 1.464 .905 (-.02) 1.518 .000 .000
STDS: 809 809 809 809 810 333 809 340 --- ---
The weird thing is that the Na, K and Ti concentrations are off by 100, 3000 and 200% respectively. So I suspect that your standards are entered into the standard database wrong or they have gotten mixed up.
I would start by making sure that your standards are what you think they are. Analysis of silicate glasses should be similar to analysis of silicate minerals. Maybe try analyzing your silicate minerals (and SiO2) as your primary Si standard and then try to analyze some of your silicate glass standards as secondary standards and see what you get.
Finally, if you are going to utilize TDI correction on these glasses (and you probably should), the elements that you want to apply TDI corrections to (in alkali glasses) are generally Si, Al, Na and K. So that means that those elements all need to be acquired first on their respective spectrometers.