Purely from recollection, for an epma with a take off angle of 40degrees, the .in takeoff angle may need to be amended (measured from the vertical)
And, personally speaking, I think, rather than running for a set time, its better to use the REFLIN option to specify an error on a line if interest.
Other things of note - c1 and c2 should be checked to see if they influence the results. Experience says maybe not, but depending on what your trying to achieve, they should be checked with short runs. Efficiency is definitely optimised by choosing the input parameters - especially the cutoffs - in this line carefully.
Actually, is anyone interested in an 'end users' guide to penepma? Once I fully understand some of the more esoteric details of the new version, I don't mind putting something together detailing this, .geo and a basic guide to Penelope for xrf and the like (this will mean I have to bribe Xavier with a beer for three!). But only if there's interest.....
The PENELOPE family, together with the Salvat database on cross sections are excellent resources for things as diverse as BSE and X-ray yield across a range of analytical techniques. The authors really cannot be given enough credit for a serious contribution and should be both applauded and supported.