Author Topic: Fe Ll mac  (Read 299 times)

Ben Buse

  • Professor
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Fe Ll mac
« on: August 01, 2017, 05:10:17 am »
Hi,

I notice in PFE the FFAST mac Fe Ll in Fe is listed as 2610.3 whilst in Gopon's paper its listed as 2765 for FFAST - any ideas which is right?

In Calczaf Fe Ll Fe is a typo  its listed as 12092.77 which is Fe Lb in Fe

Thanks

Ben

Brian Joy

  • Professor
  • ****
  • Posts: 71
Re: Fe Ll mac
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2017, 06:45:50 am »
I notice in PFE the FFAST mac Fe Ll in Fe is listed as 2610.3 whilst in Gopon's paper its listed as 2765 for FFAST - any ideas which is right?

Hi Ben,

When I use my polynomial interpolation program, I get mu/rho = 2614 cm2/g for X-ray energy = 615.2 eV (from Bearden) in pure Fe.  I can send you a copy of the program if you want.

Brian

Brian Joy
Queen's University
Kingston, Ontario
JEOL JXA-8230

Ben Buse

  • Professor
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Re: Fe Ll mac
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2017, 12:16:05 pm »
Hi Brian,

Thanks for confirming that, yes it be good to have a copy of the program (I'll send you an email)

Thanks

Ben
« Last Edit: August 01, 2017, 12:38:05 pm by Ben Buse »

Ben Buse

  • Professor
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Re: Fe Ll mac
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2017, 11:35:12 pm »

In Calczaf Fe Ll Fe is a typo  its listed as 12092.77 which is Fe Lb in Fe


I've just checked and in calczaf program - the quantification uses the correct MAC like PFE - its just the displayed mac - i.e. when you click 'display emitter absorber pair' . Oddly enough not when you click show MAC table - here its correct.

Ben

John Donovan

  • Administrator
  • Emeritus
  • *****
  • Posts: 1987
  • Other duties as assigned...
    • Probe Software
Re: Fe Ll mac
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2017, 08:39:11 am »

In Calczaf Fe Ll Fe is a typo  its listed as 12092.77 which is Fe Lb in Fe


I've just checked and in calczaf program - the quantification uses the correct MAC like PFE - its just the displayed mac - i.e. when you click 'display emitter absorber pair' . Oddly enough not when you click show MAC table - here its correct.

Ben

Hi Ben,
Good catch.

It's just a display issue for that menu, which I have already fixed and will upload later today.

Thanks.
john
John J. Donovan, Pres. 
(541) 343-3400

"Not Absolutely Certain, Yet Reliable"

John Donovan

  • Administrator
  • Emeritus
  • *****
  • Posts: 1987
  • Other duties as assigned...
    • Probe Software
Re: Fe Ll mac
« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2017, 05:42:31 pm »

In Calczaf Fe Ll Fe is a typo  its listed as 12092.77 which is Fe Lb in Fe


I've just checked and in calczaf program - the quantification uses the correct MAC like PFE - its just the displayed mac - i.e. when you click 'display emitter absorber pair' . Oddly enough not when you click show MAC table - here its correct.

Ben

Hi Ben,
Good catch.

It's just a display issue for that menu, which I have already fixed and will upload later today.

Thanks.
john

Hi Ben,
The latest CalcZAF 11.9.6 is fixed for this display issue and ready to download.  Note that because I didn't bump the version number you should run the update/install twice, the 2nd time being a "repair" to get the updated exe.
john
John J. Donovan, Pres. 
(541) 343-3400

"Not Absolutely Certain, Yet Reliable"

Ben Buse

  • Professor
  • ****
  • Posts: 274
Re: Fe Ll mac
« Reply #6 on: August 07, 2017, 10:58:01 am »
Hi John,

Thanks, correct mac displayed

Ben

John Donovan

  • Administrator
  • Emeritus
  • *****
  • Posts: 1987
  • Other duties as assigned...
    • Probe Software
Re: Fe Ll mac
« Reply #7 on: August 07, 2017, 11:10:12 am »
Hi John,

Thanks, correct mac displayed

Ben

Since I bumped the version number to 11.9.7 this weekend, one does not need to run the installer twice.
john
John J. Donovan, Pres. 
(541) 343-3400

"Not Absolutely Certain, Yet Reliable"